• 中文版
  • BM
  • News
  • Deals
  • Reviews
    • First Impressions
    • Hands-on
    • Comparisons
  • Tech
    • Mobile
    • Computers
    • Cameras
    • Wearables
    • Audio
    • Drones
  • Telco
    • Celcom
    • Digi
    • Maxis
    • Time
    • Tune Talk
    • U Mobile
    • Unifi
    • Yes
  • Cars
  • Contribute
  • Jobs
Menu
  • 中文版
  • BM
  • News
  • Deals
  • Reviews
    • First Impressions
    • Hands-on
    • Comparisons
  • Tech
    • Mobile
    • Computers
    • Cameras
    • Wearables
    • Audio
    • Drones
  • Telco
    • Celcom
    • Digi
    • Maxis
    • Time
    • Tune Talk
    • U Mobile
    • Unifi
    • Yes
  • Cars
  • Contribute
  • Jobs
Search
  • Tech
    • News
    • Mobile
    • Computers
    • Cameras
    • Wearables
    • Audio
    • Drones
  • Telco
    • Celcom
    • Digi
    • Maxis
    • Time
    • U Mobile
    • Unifi
    • Yes
  • Reviews
    • First Impressions
    • Hands-on
    • Comparisons
  • Buyer’s Guide
  • Opinions
  • Digital Life
  • Video
  • Deals
  • How-To
  • Cars
  • Bahasa Melayu
  • EV
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
Menu
  • Tech
    • News
    • Mobile
    • Computers
    • Cameras
    • Wearables
    • Audio
    • Drones
  • Telco
    • Celcom
    • Digi
    • Maxis
    • Time
    • U Mobile
    • Unifi
    • Yes
  • Reviews
    • First Impressions
    • Hands-on
    • Comparisons
  • Buyer’s Guide
  • Opinions
  • Digital Life
  • Video
  • Deals
  • How-To
  • Cars
  • Bahasa Melayu
  • EV
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
Search
Close
Home News

Samsung Galaxy A71 gets lower camera score than Galaxy A50 on DxOMark

  • BY Alexander Wong
  • 12 April 2020
  • 10:52 pm
  • Comment
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Samsung is upping its camera game in its mid-range segment by adding a 64MP main camera on the Samsung Galaxy A71. Although the pixel and camera count have increased, surprisingly DxOMark is giving it a point lower than last year’s triple-camera Galaxy A50.

Overall, the Galaxy A71 was given a score of 84 points which is the same as the Redmi Note 8 Pro and the Black Shark 2. The Redmi Note 8 Pro also features a 64MP main camera while the Black Shark 2 uses a 48MP main shooter. What’s even surprising is that the older Galaxy A9 still manages to score higher at 88 points. To break it down, the A71 scored 89 points for photos and 74 points for the video category.

To recap, the A71 features a 64MP f/1.8 main camera with a 1/1.72″ sensor and a 12MP ultra-wide-camera. On top of that, it has two 5MP shooters for macro and depth sensing.

According to DxOMark, the A71 doesn’t improve on the Samsung Galaxy A9, which was is their first quad-camera smartphone released in 2018. In their tests, they find that both main and ultra-wide-angle cameras perform well in good light with excellent dynamic and it produces well-saturated colours. However, they added that the blue colour casts can make outdoor images disappointing.

When it comes to low-light situations, they find that the A71 struggles to autofocus and the quality of shots is low. On the flip side, they reported that the A71 can produce better bokeh than the Galaxy A9. In the video department, they added that it offers good exposure for indoors and in bright light. DxOMark also says that the device offers effective video stabilisation in static handheld shots and while walking.

It is worth pointing out that the Galaxy A9 offers better versatility than the A71 as it features a 10MP telephoto camera, that offers 2x optical zoom. The A9 also gets a 24MP main camera, 8MP ultra-wide-angle camera and a 5MP depth sensor.

To learn more, you can read the full Samsung Galaxy A71 camera review on DxoMark. For reference, below is their current ranking of devices under 85 points.

Related reading

Samsung Galaxy A51 & A71 first impressions: Applying the secret sauce
Tags: DxOMarkMobileSamsungSamsung Galaxy A71
Alexander Wong

Alexander Wong

POPULAR

Samsung Galaxy A71 gets lower camera score than Galaxy A50 on DxOMark

April 12, 2020

Malaysia to review EV policy amid concerns over strict rules affecting BYD CKD operations in Tanjung Malim

April 17, 2026

Zeekr 8X: Premium 900V PHEV SUV, up to triple-motor setup and 0–100km/h in 2.96s

April 20, 2026

Malaysia’s EV policy and the BYD debate: Are affordable EVs at risk? | Let’s Talk About #140

April 19, 2026
vivo V70 FE 200MP camera phone in Malaysia - Best value alternative for phones under RM2,000

High-Resolution Meets High-Endurance: A Closer Look at the vivo V70 FE

April 10, 2026
Apple Tap To Pay on iPhone Malaysia

Apple’s Tap to Pay on iPhone is now in Malaysia

April 22, 2026

Copyright © 2025 · SoyaCincau.com
Mind Blow Sdn Bhd (1076827-P)

  • ADVERTISE
  • DISCLAIMER

Copyright © 2026 · SoyaCincau.com – Mind Blow Sdn Bhd (1076827-P)

  • ADVERTISE
  • DISCLAIMER